1. CIE Oct/Nov 2018 session papers, marking schemes and other resources have been updated in our papers section.
    Furthermore, we have also updated resources for Edexcel, OCR, IB, TOEFL, SAT, GMAT and more.

    Click here for more information.

    Good luck with your exams.

    Dismiss Notice

Physics: Post your doubts here!

Discussion in 'International A And AS Level' started by XPFMember, Sep 29, 2011.

  1. Clark20

    Clark20

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Gender:
    Male
    I understand why option A and D are wrong. However, I dont get how option C is justified.

    The er says under conditions where mass keeps reducing, the bodys speed can change and it can accelerate. My question is, when a body is moving with constant velocity (zero resultant force) and even if its mass starts reducing, resultant force still is 0 and hence acceleration also is zero even if mass is lost. Speed shouldnt change.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. XPC Bot

    Sponsored Listings
  3. Physicist

    Physicist

    Messages:
    734
    Likes Received:
    1,026
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Gender:
    Male
    go to
    http://physics-ref.blogspot.com/2019/02/all-external-forces-on-body-cancel-out.html
     
    Hamnah Zahoor likes this.
  4. Clark20

    Clark20

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Gender:
    Male
    Hamnah Zahoor likes this.
  5. Hamnah Zahoor

    Hamnah Zahoor

    Messages:
    423
    Likes Received:
    368
    Trophy Points:
    73
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    Pakistan
    The main thing you have to focus on here is that not the ' Speed ' remains unchanged but the ' Velocity ' remains unchanged. For the acceleration to be zero the change in velocity should be zero not speed.
     
  6. Clark20

    Clark20

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Gender:
    Male
    The question implies there is 0 net force (by saying all external forces on a body cancel out which means it must be moving with constant velocity and 0 net force). When the net force is 0, by N2L there shouldnt be any change in speed as fnet=ma. Fnet=0 and 0=ma for even a reducing mass gives 0 acceleration just due to 0 net force. With 0 net force f=ma shouldnt work as an explanation for change in speed even if mass is changing.

    But, if there is net force, then fnet=ma can explain how change in mass causes the body to accelerate/change its speed

    My question is, with 0 net force how can change in mass cause a body to change its speed?
     
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2019
  7. Physicist

    Physicist

    Messages:
    734
    Likes Received:
    1,026
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Gender:
    Male
    you should check it again.
    http://physics-ref.blogspot.com/2019/02/all-external-forces-on-body-cancel-out.html
    it has been updated and not the same as previously
     
    Hamnah Zahoor likes this.
  8. Physicist

    Physicist

    Messages:
    734
    Likes Received:
    1,026
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Gender:
    Male
    it can be true but is NOT always.

    that is why the questions says 'MUST'
     
    Hamnah Zahoor likes this.
  9. Clark20

    Clark20

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Gender:
    Male
    Thank you. I understand why C is wrong.
     
    Hamnah Zahoor likes this.
  10. Alis alis

    Alis alis

    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Gender:
    Male
    IMG_20190225_191708.jpg how to do this one?
     
  11. Ebrahim12

    Ebrahim12

    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    A2 op-amp question.
    This is from the cie application booklet:
    upload_2019-2-25_18-54-26.png

    Can somebody explain how D2 blocks the back emf from affecting the op-amp exactly? Thanks.
     
  12. Clark20

    Clark20

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Gender:
    Male
    Need help understanding this question. D is the answer.
     

    Attached Files:

    Hamnah Zahoor likes this.
  13. Emmris

    Emmris

    Messages:
    950
    Likes Received:
    4,847
    Trophy Points:
    253
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    Somewhere ...... leave me alone .....
    I assume that u already know that gravity is always acting on the object through the motion ... therefore at its Max height u will have g acting downwards .... now let's study the horizontal component of the velocity, u will find out that the horizontal component throughout the journey stays constant even at its Max height which implies that air resistance is acting to balance the force , hence the acceleration of the horizontal component is zero n as u know air resistance act on opposite direction which in this case it's to the right as the object is moving to the left ...
     
    Hamnah Zahoor likes this.
  14. Emmris

    Emmris

    Messages:
    950
    Likes Received:
    4,847
    Trophy Points:
    253
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    Somewhere ...... leave me alone .....
    Actually my logic was wrong .... it's only g that acts on the object throughout the journey .... so ur answer maybe wrong ....
     
  15. Hamnah Zahoor

    Hamnah Zahoor

    Messages:
    423
    Likes Received:
    368
    Trophy Points:
    73
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    Pakistan
    I hope the examination report help understand the question:
    Question 12
    When a body is moving through air to the left, there will be a drag force acting on it to the right, as well as its weight. The answer here is D, but both A and C were more popular responses.
     
  16. Emmris

    Emmris

    Messages:
    950
    Likes Received:
    4,847
    Trophy Points:
    253
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    Somewhere ...... leave me alone .....
    https://www.google.com/search?q=for...AQ&biw=360&bih=511&dpr=2#imgrc=1Mi7aLR1qrdwYM

    It says dat only g acts on the object ....
     
    Hamnah Zahoor likes this.
  17. Hamnah Zahoor

    Hamnah Zahoor

    Messages:
    423
    Likes Received:
    368
    Trophy Points:
    73
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    Pakistan
    The site you mentioned is for projectile motion in which we assume that air resistance is negligible or equal to zero while doing our calculations.
    However, in the question mentioned above it does not states that the the air resistance was zero or it is projectile motion.
     
  18. Clark20

    Clark20

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Gender:
    Male
    Thank you.
     
    Hamnah Zahoor likes this.
  19. Clark20

    Clark20

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Gender:
    Male
    In this question, is the journey of the object between X and Y considered as projectile motion? As it follows a parabolic path.
     

    Attached Files:

    Hamnah Zahoor likes this.
  20. Hamnah Zahoor

    Hamnah Zahoor

    Messages:
    423
    Likes Received:
    368
    Trophy Points:
    73
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Yes it is considered a projectile for the motion is without air resistance and it's a parabolic path.
     
  21. MShaheerUddin

    MShaheerUddin

    Messages:
    137
    Likes Received:
    311
    Trophy Points:
    73
    Gender:
    Male
    Can anyone draw b(i) and b(ii) for me?

    Thanks
     

    Attached Files:

Share This Page